Guides/Agent boundaries & HITL
Agent boundaries & human-in-the-loop
Agents fail loudly when tools do side effects without governance — PMs ship confidence by tiering tools by blast radius, pairing automation with approvals, and logging decisions reviewers can audit.
Action lanes
Model capability matters less than which actions run unattended. Align lanes with security + legal — not only ML metrics.
Risk tiers → checkpoints
Adapt tiers to your regulatory posture — use this table to spark RACI-style conversations before coding tool routers.
| Risk tier | Example surfaces | Human-in-the-loop pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Summaries, suggestions, read APIs | Automated metrics + spot checks |
| Medium | Customer-visible drafts, internal writes | Human review queue or dual-control on odd hours |
| High | Money movement, HIPAA/FINRA paths, deletes | Hard approval, break-glass, immutable logs |
Operating principles
- Default-deny tool catalogs — promote capabilities through review instead of blocking after incidents.
- Pair agent launches with rollback + replay affordances for support teams.
- Treat prompts as insufficient guardrails — enforce policy in orchestration layers humans can inspect.